JLQD vs. CPII

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) and CPII (Ionic Inflation Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, while CPII is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Ionic. JLQD is passively managed, while CPII is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JLQD returned 5.54%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for CPII. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. JLQD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CPII.

Performance

JLQD vs. CPII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CPII's 4.27% return.

JLQD

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPII

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 4.27%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLQD vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	0.24%	7.77%	3.21%	8.76%	-1.78%
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	4.27%	2.76%	6.05%	1.79%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JLQD and CPII is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022	-0.51

The correlation between JLQD and CPII shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (3 years) to -0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JLQD vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLQD

JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 47
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CPII

CPII Risk / Return Rank: 41
CPII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CPII Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CPII Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CPII Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CPII Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLQD vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLQD	CPII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.28	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.82	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.73	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.63	6.37	+1.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLQD vs. CPII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLQD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the CPII Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLQD and CPII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLQD	CPII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.28	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.69	-0.67

Drawdowns

JLQD vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than CPII's maximum drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and CPII.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLQD	CPII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.17%	-6.40%	-14.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	-1.62%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	-4.39%	-2.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.40%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-1.62%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.70%	+0.12%

Volatility

JLQD vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) at 1.14%. This indicates that JLQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLQD	CPII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.14%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	2.81%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	3.48%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.93%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.93%	+0.39%

JLQD vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLQD vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison

JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than CPII's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	4.05%	4.20%	5.47%	5.86%	2.21%	0.00%
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	5.44%	5.28%	5.36%	3.99%	2.77%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLQD and CPII in my portfolio?

JLQD and CPII have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLQD or CPII?

JLQD has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to CPII (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLQD dropped -21.17% vs CPII's -6.40%.

Which ETF is better, JLQD or CPII?

On 3-year performance, JLQD leads with 5.54% vs 5.05% for CPII. On fees, JLQD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CPII has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JLQD or CPII?

Over the 3-year period, JLQD has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JLQD or CPII?

JLQD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CPII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JLQD or CPII?

JLQD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.05% for CPII.

What is the main difference between JLQD and CPII?

JLQD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CPII is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Ionic. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JLQD and 0.74% for CPII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.