PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLMRX vs. SVBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLMRX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than SVBAX's 9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, JLMRX has underperformed SVBAX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while SVBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.


JLMRX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.33%
6M
3.55%
YTD
5.23%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
5.71%
ALL TIME*
5.47%

SVBAX

1D
1.78%
1M
-0.37%
6M
7.75%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
5.23%11.91%7.45%11.20%-13.79%7.42%10.21%16.25%-3.93%8.36%
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
9.73%15.69%13.31%18.22%-15.79%14.49%15.97%21.28%-5.02%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JLMRX and SVBAX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.91

The correlation between JLMRX and SVBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLMRX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLMRX
JLMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JLMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JLMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SVBAX
SVBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SVBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SVBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLMRXSVBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.23

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

14.71

-5.25

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SVBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLMRX and SVBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLMRX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum SVBAX drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLMRX and SVBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLMRXSVBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-40.81%

+20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-5.57%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-12.06%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.46%

-20.53%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

-21.00%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.05%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-5.22%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.22%

-0.10%

Volatility

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) is 1.77%, while John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that JLMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLMRXSVBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.82%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

7.40%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36%

9.09%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

10.92%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.53%

10.81%

-2.28%

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLMRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLMRX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison

JLMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than SVBAX's 11.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
3.01%3.13%3.06%3.05%6.73%5.05%4.11%5.53%6.16%2.18%2.98%2.41%
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
11.42%12.45%3.72%1.48%1.60%2.73%1.60%2.19%8.06%3.51%1.70%4.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JLMRX and SVBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SVBAX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JLMRX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLMRX dropped -20.60% vs SVBAX's -40.81%.

SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLMRX and SVBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer