PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLMRX vs. JHNBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLMRX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, JLMRX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.


JLMRX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.33%
6M
3.55%
YTD
5.23%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
5.71%
ALL TIME*
5.47%

JHNBX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.33%
6M
-1.15%
YTD
-0.74%
1Y
2.11%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
1.89%
ALL TIME*
4.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
5.23%11.91%7.45%11.20%-13.79%7.42%10.21%16.25%-3.93%8.36%
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
-0.74%7.53%1.97%6.24%-15.22%-0.68%10.31%10.09%-1.15%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JLMRX and JHNBX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.32

Over the past year, JLMRX and JHNBX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLMRX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLMRX
JLMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JLMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JLMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JHNBX
JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLMRXJHNBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.00

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

2.55

+6.92

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLMRX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLMRX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum JHNBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLMRX and JHNBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLMRXJHNBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-24.74%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-3.25%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-5.67%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.46%

-20.13%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

-20.13%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-3.11%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-4.14%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.27%

-0.15%

Volatility

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.03%. This indicates that JLMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLMRXJHNBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.03%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

3.11%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36%

3.92%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

5.89%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.53%

4.93%

+3.60%

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLMRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLMRX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

JLMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than JHNBX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
4.20%4.41%4.14%3.80%2.93%3.30%5.50%3.75%3.51%3.23%3.19%3.48%
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
3.01%3.13%3.06%3.05%6.73%5.05%4.11%5.53%6.16%2.18%2.98%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLMRX and JHNBX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLMRX has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to JHNBX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLMRX dropped -20.60% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

JLMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLMRX and JHNBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer