PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. PBCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTQX has underperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


PLTQX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.55%
6M
7.99%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.78%

PBCKX

1D
-2.20%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-5.15%
6M
-5.85%
1Y
-1.17%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
8.55%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
-5.15%9.20%26.90%40.58%-30.74%25.05%34.77%45.22%2.83%28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and PBCKX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.88

The correlation between PLTQX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PBCKX
PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTQXPBCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.01

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

-0.02

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

-0.05

+13.68

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, smaller than the maximum PBCKX drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and PBCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXPBCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-38.00%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-19.10%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-19.10%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-38.00%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-38.00%

+8.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-8.75%

+7.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-5.65%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

6.45%

-4.82%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) is 4.13%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that PLTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXPBCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.79%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

13.10%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

15.89%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

20.45%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

20.26%

-6.43%

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than PBCKX's 21.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
21.03%19.94%9.01%0.51%0.71%6.67%3.28%8.90%7.86%2.79%1.01%2.40%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.15%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTQX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBCKX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PLTQX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

PLTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and PBCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer