PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKYX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 12.19% return.


JLKYX

1D
-1.90%
1M
0.00%
YTD
10.33%
6M
9.35%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
11.70%

FFSZX

1D
-2.22%
1M
0.76%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.48%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
10.33%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%8.52%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
12.19%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and FFSZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JLKYX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLKYXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.93

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

12.84

-0.93

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKYXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-31.00%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-9.77%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-15.36%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-27.17%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.50%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-5.77%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.23%

-0.12%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) is 5.37%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that JLKYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKYXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

6.20%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

11.93%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

13.92%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.22%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

17.12%

-0.91%

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKYX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLKYX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than FFSZX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.11%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.27%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JLKYX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to JLKYX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKYX dropped -32.55% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKYX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer