JLKUX vs. TAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX).
JLKUX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Mar 25, 2014. TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984.
Performance
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLKUX John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio | -4.58% | 12.97% | 15.52% | 18.68% | -19.64% | 15.82% | 20.34% | 24.86% | -8.96% | 18.41% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -10.79% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLKUX achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKUX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.
JLKUX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -6.67%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
TAGRX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLKUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JLKUX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
JLKUX
TAGRX
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLKUX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.27 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 0.51 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.16 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.57 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLKUX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.27 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.45 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between JLKUX and TAGRX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison
JLKUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than TAGRX's 13.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLKUX John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio | 1.96% | 1.87% | 3.23% | 3.28% | 15.00% | 9.92% | 4.36% | 8.74% | 11.46% | 3.34% | 4.83% | 2.95% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.55% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLKUX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKUX and TAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLKUX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.07% | -58.45% | +26.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -14.04% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.12% | -29.10% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.07% | -36.96% | +4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.86% | -14.04% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -11.57% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 4.06% | +0.28% |
Volatility
JLKUX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) at 4.09%. This indicates that JLKUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JLKUX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 4.09% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 9.70% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 18.74% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 20.18% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 20.49% | -4.06% |