JLKUX vs. JVLIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLKUX (John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) and JVLIX (John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund) are both mutual funds - JLKUX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock, while JVLIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JLKUX returned 10.88%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for JVLIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JLKUX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JVLIX.

Performance

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKUX achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than JVLIX's 16.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKUX has underperformed JVLIX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while JVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.

JLKUX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 9.07%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 10.88%

JVLIX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 6M: 17.45%
• 1Y: 33.27%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLKUX John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	13.44%	12.97%	15.52%	18.68%	-19.64%	15.82%	20.34%	24.86%	-8.96%	18.41%
JVLIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund	16.63%	17.48%	15.59%	13.91%	-4.45%	29.92%	1.59%	22.70%	-9.75%	17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKUX and JVLIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2014	0.86

The correlation between JLKUX and JVLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JLKUX vs. JVLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKUX

JLKUX Risk / Return Rank: 44
JLKUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JLKUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
JLKUX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
JLKUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
JLKUX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

JVLIX

JVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 84
JVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
JVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
JVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
JVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLKUX	JVLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.79	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.82	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.50	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	4.31	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.34	18.35	-8.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the JVLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKUX and JVLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLKUX	JVLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	2.79	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.73	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.67	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.37	+0.23

Drawdowns

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKUX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum JVLIX drawdown of -59.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKUX and JVLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLKUX	JVLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-59.12%	+27.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.86%	-7.95%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.88%	-20.48%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.12%	-20.48%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.07%	-40.33%	+8.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-10.52%	+5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	1.86%	+0.53%

Volatility

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLKUX	JVLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	3.87%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	9.69%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	12.27%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	17.32%	-1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	18.90%	-2.39%

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JVLIX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLKUX vs. JVLIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than JVLIX's 5.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKUX John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	1.65%	1.87%	3.23%	3.28%	15.00%	9.92%	4.36%	8.74%	11.46%	3.34%	4.83%	2.95%
JVLIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund	5.69%	6.64%	13.97%	7.22%	7.16%	14.63%	1.57%	5.87%	10.59%	4.60%	1.22%	3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLKUX and JVLIX in my portfolio?

JLKUX and JVLIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLKUX or JVLIX?

JVLIX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JLKUX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKUX dropped -32.07% vs JVLIX's -59.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.