JLIAX vs. JHNBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JLIAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio) and JHNBX (John Hancock Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - JLIAX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock, while JHNBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JLIAX returned 10.23%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for JHNBX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. JLIAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JHNBX.

Performance

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLIAX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, JLIAX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.

JLIAX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 10.70%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

JHNBX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: 0.02%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLIAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio	10.70%	17.06%	12.87%	16.80%	-19.86%	14.83%	19.46%	23.96%	-9.08%	18.19%
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	0.32%	7.53%	1.97%	6.24%	-15.22%	-0.68%	10.31%	10.09%	-1.15%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and JHNBX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006	-0.01

The correlation between JLIAX and JHNBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLIAX

JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

JHNBX

JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 22
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLIAX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.33	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	1.97	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.62	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	4.93	+7.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLIAX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	1.33	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.00	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.45	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.75	-0.35

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than JHNBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and JHNBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLIAX	JHNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-24.74%	-31.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-3.25%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.42%	-6.69%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.78%	-20.13%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.05%	-20.13%	-10.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-2.07%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-4.15%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.07%	+0.86%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.38%. This indicates that JLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLIAX	JHNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	1.38%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	2.91%	+5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	3.99%	+6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	5.87%	+8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.15%	4.91%	+10.24%

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLIAX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than JHNBX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	4.48%	4.41%	4.14%	3.80%	2.93%	3.30%	5.50%	3.75%	3.51%	3.23%	3.19%	3.48%
JLIAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio	8.29%	9.18%	2.86%	2.82%	22.31%	9.18%	5.58%	11.19%	13.74%	6.10%	6.95%	6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLIAX and JHNBX in my portfolio?

JLIAX and JHNBX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLIAX or JHNBX?

JLIAX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to JHNBX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.