PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHNBX vs. TILUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHNBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than TILUX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JHNBX has underperformed TILUX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while TILUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


JHNBX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.77%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
2.21%

TILUX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
0.32%7.53%1.97%6.24%-15.22%-0.68%10.31%10.09%-1.15%4.94%
TILUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund
1.15%6.41%1.86%3.34%-12.14%5.42%12.70%8.11%-2.05%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JHNBX and TILUX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2016

0.72

The correlation between JHNBX and TILUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHNBX vs. TILUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHNBX
JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TILUX
TILUX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TILUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TILUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHNBXTILUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.61

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

4.34

+0.59

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHNBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the TILUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHNBX and TILUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHNBXTILUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.03

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.12

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.54

+0.22

Drawdowns

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHNBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than TILUX's maximum drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHNBX and TILUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHNBXTILUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-14.72%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-2.72%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

-4.41%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-14.72%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.13%

-14.72%

-5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-0.77%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-3.60%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.01%

+0.06%

Volatility

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX) at 1.26%. This indicates that JHNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHNBXTILUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.26%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

2.89%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

4.27%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

6.02%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

5.41%

-0.50%

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHNBX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than TILUX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHNBX vs. TILUX - Dividend Comparison

JHNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than TILUX's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
4.48%4.41%4.14%3.80%2.93%3.30%5.50%3.75%3.51%3.23%3.19%3.48%
TILUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund
3.08%2.92%3.72%1.77%16.54%9.24%2.28%2.27%3.45%3.01%2.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHNBX and TILUX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHNBX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to TILUX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHNBX dropped -24.74% vs TILUX's -14.72%.

JHNBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHNBX and TILUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer