PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLIAX vs. JCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLIAX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than JCCIX's 19.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JLIAX having a 10.29% annualized return and JCCIX not far ahead at 10.44%.


JLIAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.69%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.09%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.29%

JCCIX

1D
1.00%
1M
6.07%
YTD
19.09%
6M
19.13%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
11.32%17.06%12.87%16.80%-19.86%14.83%19.46%23.96%-9.08%18.19%
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
19.09%-1.90%10.62%16.52%-19.09%24.10%25.99%26.79%-18.28%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and JCCIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013

0.86

The correlation between JLIAX and JCCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLIAX
JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JCCIX
JCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLIAXJCCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

1.61

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.32

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.85

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.01

9.05

+3.96

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the JCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and JCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLIAXJCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.61

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.21

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.43

-0.03

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than JCCIX's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and JCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLIAXJCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-38.69%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-10.42%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-27.47%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-27.47%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.05%

-38.69%

+7.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-7.61%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.27%

-1.34%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) is 3.46%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that JLIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLIAXJCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.03%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

12.82%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

18.44%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

21.61%

-7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

21.49%

-6.34%

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLIAX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than JCCIX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCCIX
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund
3.80%4.53%0.96%0.83%0.99%12.20%1.43%0.00%5.55%11.90%0.73%1.07%
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
8.24%9.18%2.86%2.82%22.31%9.18%5.58%11.19%13.74%6.10%6.95%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLIAX and JCCIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCCIX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to JLIAX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs JCCIX's -38.69%.

JLIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLIAX and JCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer