JLHAX vs. JRLVX
JLHAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds from John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX returned 9.37%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLHAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JRLVX.
Performance
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLHAX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
JLHAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
JRLVX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio | 9.81% | 16.08% | 11.11% | 15.50% | -19.47% | 13.90% | 18.27% | 22.86% | -8.60% | 16.86% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 11.90% | 19.25% | 14.50% | 18.00% | -18.06% | 18.45% | 16.23% | 25.03% | -8.29% | 17.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLHAX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013 | 0.99 |
The correlation between JLHAX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLHAX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank
JLHAX
JRLVX
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLHAX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.17 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 14.06 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLHAX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.39 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLHAX drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than JRLVX's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLHAX and JRLVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLHAX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -32.53% | -23.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -8.50% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -15.27% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -25.64% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.14% | -32.53% | +3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.38% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.69% | -4.56% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.91% | -0.18% |
Volatility
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) have volatilities of 3.17% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLHAX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.33% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 8.98% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.74% | 11.29% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 14.77% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 15.98% | -2.12% |
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
JLHAX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison
JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio | 8.02% | 8.81% | 2.68% | 2.53% | 20.06% | 9.76% | 5.83% | 11.13% | 13.05% | 6.74% | 6.80% | 6.36% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.55% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 8.03% | 6.00% | 4.26% | 8.99% | 10.96% | 4.29% | 3.40% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, JLHAX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to JLHAX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLHAX dropped -56.42% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.
JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLHAX and JRLVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer