JLHAX vs. FCTKX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JLHAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio) and FCTKX (Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, JLHAX returned 6.68%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for FCTKX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLHAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FCTKX.

Performance

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLHAX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 14.99% return.

JLHAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: 14.39%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

FCTKX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 14.99%
• 6M: 15.03%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	9.91%	16.08%	11.11%	15.50%	-19.47%	13.90%	18.27%	22.86%	-8.60%	6.06%
FCTKX Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6	14.99%	24.06%	14.41%	20.84%	-18.09%	16.86%	18.53%	25.67%	-8.66%	9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JLHAX and FCTKX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017	0.98

The correlation between JLHAX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLHAX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLHAX

JLHAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
JLHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JLHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JLHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
JLHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JLHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FCTKX

FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLHAX	FCTKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.36	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.21	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.32	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	14.54	-2.27

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLHAX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLHAX drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than FCTKX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLHAX and FCTKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLHAX	FCTKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.42%	-30.94%	-25.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-9.78%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	-15.40%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.99%	-27.16%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.67%	-5.44%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	2.23%	-0.46%

Volatility

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) is 4.32%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that JLHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLHAX	FCTKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	5.83%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	11.74%	-2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.39%	13.77%	-3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.86%	15.22%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	15.95%	-2.05%

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLHAX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than FCTKX's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTKX Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6	5.09%	4.06%	2.31%	2.19%	11.70%	11.47%	4.40%	6.53%	7.08%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	8.02%	8.81%	2.68%	2.53%	20.06%	9.76%	5.83%	11.13%	13.05%	6.74%	6.80%	6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLHAX and FCTKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JLHAX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JLHAX or FCTKX?

FCTKX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to JLHAX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLHAX dropped -56.42% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.