JLHAX vs. JAAAX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JLHAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio) and JAAAX (John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - JLHAX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock, while JAAAX is a Multistrategy fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX returned 9.37%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for JAAAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JLHAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for JAAAX.

Performance

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLHAX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than JAAAX's 6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX has outperformed JAAAX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while JAAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.

JLHAX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 10.26%
• 1Y: 21.93%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 6.40%
• 10Y*: 9.37%

JAAAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 6.52%
• 1Y: 11.34%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 4.34%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	9.81%	16.08%	11.11%	15.50%	-19.47%	13.90%	18.27%	22.86%	-8.60%	16.86%
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund	6.31%	6.18%	6.59%	5.85%	-3.12%	4.77%	4.36%	8.95%	-4.09%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JLHAX and JAAAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.87

The correlation between JLHAX and JAAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JLHAX vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLHAX

JLHAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
JLHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
JLHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
JLHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JLHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JLHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

JAAAX

JAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
JAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
JAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLHAX	JAAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	3.47	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	5.20	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.70	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.64	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	22.33	-9.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is lower than the JAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLHAX and JAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLHAX	JAAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	3.47	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	1.04	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.97	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.87	-0.47

Drawdowns

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLHAX drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than JAAAX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLHAX and JAAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLHAX	JAAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.42%	-15.72%	-40.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-2.02%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	-5.66%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.99%	-6.28%	-20.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.14%	-12.64%	-16.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.06%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.69%	-2.04%	-6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.51%	+1.22%

Volatility

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 0.73%. This indicates that JLHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLHAX	JAAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	0.73%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	2.50%	+5.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.74%	3.28%	+6.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.76%	4.21%	+8.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	4.37%	+9.49%

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLHAX vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison

JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than JAAAX's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund	1.44%	1.53%	1.17%	1.71%	3.02%	1.72%	0.74%	3.38%	1.99%	1.23%	0.77%	2.78%
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	8.02%	8.81%	2.68%	2.53%	20.06%	9.76%	5.83%	11.13%	13.05%	6.74%	6.80%	6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLHAX and JAAAX in my portfolio?

JLHAX and JAAAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLHAX or JAAAX?

JLHAX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to JAAAX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLHAX dropped -56.42% vs JAAAX's -15.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.