JLHAX vs. FRQIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JLHAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio) and FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JLHAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FRQIX.

Performance

JLHAX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JLHAX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: 5.04%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 16.88%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: 5.86%
• 10Y*: 8.95%
• ALL TIME*: 6.72%

FRQIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JLHAX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	8.06%	16.08%	11.11%	15.50%	-19.47%	13.90%	18.27%	22.86%	-8.60%	16.86%
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.60%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between JLHAX and FRQIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007	0.92

The correlation between JLHAX and FRQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (3 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JLHAX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLHAX

JLHAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
JLHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JLHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JLHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JLHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
JLHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FRQIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLHAX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLHAX	FRQIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	JLHAX	FRQIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JLHAX	FRQIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.89%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.81%	—	—

JLHAX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLHAX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than FRQIX's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	2.78%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio	8.15%	8.81%	2.68%	2.53%	20.06%	9.76%	5.83%	11.13%	13.05%	6.74%	6.80%	6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLHAX and FRQIX in my portfolio?

JLHAX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.