PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIVE vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIVE vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIVE achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 22.59% return.


JIVE

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.79%
6M
10.74%
YTD
19.28%
1Y
41.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.28%

IFLO

1D
-1.73%
1M
3.06%
6M
17.38%
YTD
22.59%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$595.85K$548.57K$406.06K
$31.51M$29.83M$30.13M

JIVE vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JIVE and IFLO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.85

The correlation between JIVE and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIVE vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JIVE
IFLO

Financial Services

39.0%
0.8%

Technology

12.7%
16.8%

Industrials

10.2%
17.8%

Energy

9.5%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
10.8%

Basic Materials

5.1%
13.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
6.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.3%

Utilities

2.5%
0.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

JIVE
39.0%
IFLO
0.8%

Technology

JIVE
12.7%
IFLO
16.8%

Industrials

JIVE
10.2%
IFLO
17.8%

Energy

JIVE
9.5%
IFLO
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JIVE
5.9%
IFLO
10.8%

Basic Materials

JIVE
5.1%
IFLO
13.8%

Healthcare

JIVE
4.6%
IFLO
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

JIVE
4.3%
IFLO
6.7%

Communication Services

JIVE
4.1%
IFLO
5.3%

Utilities

JIVE
2.5%
IFLO
0.8%

Real Estate

JIVE
2.3%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIVE vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JIVE
JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JIVE vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIVEIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

5.73

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.89

19.78

-4.89

JIVE vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIVE and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIVE vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIVE drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIVE and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIVEIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-6.44%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-6.44%

-4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-1.73%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-1.29%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.86%

+0.93%

Volatility

JIVE vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 4.10%. This indicates that JIVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIVEIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.10%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

12.32%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

14.41%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

14.59%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

14.59%

+0.53%

JIVE vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIVE vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

JIVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IFLO's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.52%0.73%0.00%0.00%
JIVE
JPMorgan International Value ETF
2.41%2.88%2.48%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIVE and IFLO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIVE has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IFLO (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIVE dropped -13.79% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 41.61% vs 36.91% for IFLO. On fees, JIVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 41.61% return vs 36.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JIVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.52% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIVE and 0.56% for IFLO.

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIVE and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer