JILCX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
JILCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | -1.22% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 8.96% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 4.12%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 6.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
SIFAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILCX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
JILCX
SIFAX
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILCX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.03 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.86 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 3.49 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 8.92 | -2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILCX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.03 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.25 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.76 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.36 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILCX and SIFAX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than SIFAX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.41% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.18% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SIFAX drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILCX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -23.62% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.06% | -3.07% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -8.32% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.51% | -14.69% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.35% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -8.65% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.25% | -0.20% |
Volatility
JILCX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) is 1.45%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that JILCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILCX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 2.04% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 3.93% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.52% | 5.30% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 5.50% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 5.16% | -0.14% |