PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGMX vs. TRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than TRLVX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX has outperformed TRLVX with an annualized return of 1.63%, while TRLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.


JIGMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.17%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
1.63%

TRLVX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.07%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
0.03%7.50%1.36%4.55%-14.64%-1.49%9.76%8.71%-0.19%3.91%
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.05%7.06%0.83%5.92%-15.66%-1.63%9.04%9.25%-0.47%4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGMX and TRLVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between JIGMX and TRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGMX vs. TRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGMX
JIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLVX
TRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGMXTRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.46

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

4.39

+0.47

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the TRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGMX and TRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGMXTRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.17

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

-0.10

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.29

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.02

-0.63

Drawdowns

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum TRLVX drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and TRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGMXTRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-20.98%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.29%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

-6.90%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-20.68%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-20.98%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-5.18%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-2.48%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.09%

+0.02%

Volatility

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) is 1.33%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that JIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGMXTRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.97%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

4.13%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

6.38%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

5.24%

-0.27%

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLVX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGMX vs. TRLVX - Dividend Comparison

JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than TRLVX's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
4.17%4.10%3.82%2.43%2.57%2.34%4.61%2.92%2.92%2.77%2.83%0.00%
TRLVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
3.67%3.52%4.01%3.38%1.80%1.90%5.98%3.73%2.77%2.36%4.46%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JIGMX and TRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRLVX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to JIGMX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGMX dropped -19.82% vs TRLVX's -20.98%.

JIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGMX and TRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer