PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGDX vs. TAGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGDX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than TAGRX's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGDX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


JIGDX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.03%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.06%

TAGRX

1D
-0.92%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.49%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
1.00%8.33%0.42%8.15%-10.84%-1.89%11.65%6.77%-1.71%8.54%
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
2.30%9.98%21.14%32.23%-24.86%29.16%20.55%35.06%-14.09%19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGDX and TAGRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005

0.01

Over the past year, JIGDX and TAGRX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGDX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGDX
JIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TAGRX
TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGDXTAGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.10

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

3.84

+2.93

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the TAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGDX and TAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGDXTAGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.23

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.41

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Drawdowns

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGDX drawdown since its inception was -20.55%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGDX and TAGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGDXTAGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-58.45%

+37.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-14.04%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.19%

-26.11%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-29.10%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.23%

-36.96%

+17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.76%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-11.54%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

4.01%

-3.05%

Volatility

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) is 1.68%, while John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that JIGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGDXTAGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.91%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

9.57%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

12.54%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

20.18%

-15.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

20.50%

-15.52%

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGDX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison

JIGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than TAGRX's 11.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
2.59%3.38%2.32%0.40%5.52%1.24%5.15%3.58%1.36%0.00%0.37%0.02%
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
11.82%12.09%13.00%6.67%6.76%7.82%0.30%0.53%14.05%8.22%2.96%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGDX and TAGRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGRX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to JIGDX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGDX dropped -20.55% vs TAGRX's -58.45%.

JIGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGDX and TAGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer