PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGDX vs. DGFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGDX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 2.66% return.


JIGDX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.47%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
2.04%

DGFFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
1.41%8.33%0.42%8.15%-10.84%-1.89%11.65%6.77%-1.71%7.01%
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.66%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGDX and DGFFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.41

The correlation between JIGDX and DGFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGDX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGDX
JIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIGDXDGFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.89

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

6.46

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

29.25

-23.07

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the DGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGDX and DGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGDX drawdown since its inception was -20.55%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGDX and DGFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGDXDGFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-12.69%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-1.19%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.19%

-3.38%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-8.17%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.21%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-1.32%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.45%

+0.52%

Volatility

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) at 0.62%. This indicates that JIGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGDXDGFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.62%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

1.47%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

2.08%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

2.43%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

2.60%

+2.38%

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGDX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison

JIGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DGFFX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.24%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%0.00%0.00%
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
1.75%3.38%2.32%0.40%5.52%1.24%5.15%3.58%1.36%0.00%0.37%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGDX and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIGDX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to DGFFX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGDX dropped -20.55% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGDX and DGFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer