JIG vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JIG (JPMorgan International Growth ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. JIG is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Over the past year, JIG returned 26.14% vs 65.39% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

JIG vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 34.64% return.

JIG

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 6M: 15.70%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 65.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	16.02%	20.10%	-3.69%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.64%	40.01%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JIG and PATN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.91

The correlation between JIG and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIG vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JIG	PATN
Technology	24.3%	52.5%
Industrials	17.2%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	7.0%
Financial Services	6.3%	0.5%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.4%
Healthcare	2.8%	9.4%
Communication Services	2.4%	6.1%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	5.2%
Energy	0.6%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

JIG vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG

JIG Risk / Return Rank: 41
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIG	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.75	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	3.37	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.49	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	4.56	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	17.76	-10.21

JIG vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIG vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIG	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.75%	-16.77%	-26.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.94%	-14.40%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-5.19%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.65%	-3.17%	-13.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.69%	-0.22%

Volatility

JIG vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) is 9.43%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that JIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIG	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	12.88%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.16%	21.37%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.19%	23.92%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	22.26%	-2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.28%	22.26%	-2.98%

JIG vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIG vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than PATN's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	1.94%	2.25%	1.70%	1.69%	0.91%	1.35%	0.04%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIG and PATN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, JIG and PATN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JIG or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to JIG (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, JIG or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 65.39% vs 26.14% for JIG. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, JIG has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JIG or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 26.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIG or PATN?

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIG or PATN?

JIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.61% for PATN.

What is the main difference between JIG and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.