PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIG vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIG vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 24.89% return.


JIG

1D
0.59%
1M
4.04%
YTD
16.35%
6M
16.73%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*

FDT

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.67%
YTD
24.89%
6M
27.78%
1Y
53.72%
3Y*
29.96%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JIG
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
16.35%20.10%8.84%13.00%-30.57%6.40%40.92%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
24.89%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%30.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JIG and FDT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020

0.81

The correlation between JIG and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIG vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JIG
FDT

Technology

23.0%
8.1%

Industrials

18.6%
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.5%

Financial Services

7.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

3.8%
9.6%

Healthcare

3.1%
1.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.7%

Utilities

2.6%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
2.8%

Energy

0.7%
9.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
5.3%

Technology

JIG
23.0%
FDT
8.1%

Industrials

JIG
18.6%
FDT
34.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JIG
8.1%
FDT
11.5%

Financial Services

JIG
7.0%
FDT
10.2%

Basic Materials

JIG
3.8%
FDT
9.6%

Healthcare

JIG
3.1%
FDT
1.4%

Communication Services

JIG
2.7%
FDT
2.7%

Utilities

JIG
2.6%
FDT
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

JIG
0.8%
FDT
2.8%

Energy

JIG
0.7%
FDT
9.2%

Real Estate

JIG
0.6%
FDT
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIG vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG
JIG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.52

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

4.03

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

15.71

-8.44

JIG vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.93

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.69

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.39

+0.14

Drawdowns

JIG vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.75%

-46.10%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-13.41%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-14.29%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

-33.18%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-2.07%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-10.77%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.43%

-0.03%

Volatility

JIG vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) have volatilities of 7.07% and 7.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

7.03%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

15.93%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

18.42%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

18.23%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

18.52%

+0.51%

JIG vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIG vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than FDT's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.85%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
JIG
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
1.93%2.25%1.70%1.69%0.91%1.35%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIG and FDT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to FDT (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.44% vs 3.68% for JIG. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.93% for JIG.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIG and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer