PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPWRX vs. FFSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPWRX achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly lower than FFSFX's 14.96% return.


LPWRX

1D
1.41%
1M
1.83%
YTD
12.99%
6M
12.65%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

FFSFX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.36%
YTD
14.96%
6M
15.00%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
12.99%20.43%8.99%22.14%-18.94%17.84%13.47%5.28%
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
14.96%23.76%14.01%20.54%-18.28%16.54%18.08%6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LPWRX and FFSFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.95

The correlation between LPWRX and FFSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPWRX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPWRX
LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSFX
FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPWRXFFSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.29

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

14.37

-2.19

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPWRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FFSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPWRX and FFSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPWRX drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, which is greater than FFSFX's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPWRX and FFSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPWRXFFSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.27%

-31.03%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-9.79%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.36%

-15.43%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.28%

-27.31%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

0.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-5.87%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.23%

+0.12%

Volatility

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) at 5.83%. This indicates that LPWRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPWRXFFSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

5.83%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

11.74%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

13.74%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

15.20%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

17.10%

+1.55%

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPWRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPWRX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison

LPWRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than FFSFX's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
4.86%3.69%2.29%2.01%8.77%7.81%2.25%1.40%
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
2.00%2.26%1.00%2.07%2.35%9.34%1.00%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LPWRX and FFSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LPWRX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to FFSFX (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPWRX dropped -33.27% vs FFSFX's -31.03%.

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPWRX and FFSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer