LPWRX vs. JRLVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LPWRX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LPWRX returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.73%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LPWRX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JRLVX.

Performance

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPWRX achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than JRLVX's 11.90% return.

LPWRX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 6M: 12.65%
• 1Y: 29.37%
• 3Y*: 16.80%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

JRLVX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 17.60%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LPWRX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund	12.99%	20.43%	8.99%	22.14%	-18.94%	17.84%	13.47%	5.28%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.90%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LPWRX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.96

The correlation between LPWRX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LPWRX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPWRX

LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 54
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 70
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LPWRX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.24	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.07	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	3.15	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	13.66	-1.48

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPWRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPWRX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPWRX drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPWRX and JRLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LPWRX	JRLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.27%	-32.53%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-8.50%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.36%	-15.27%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.28%	-25.64%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.38%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-4.55%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.96%	+0.39%

Volatility

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 4.82%. This indicates that LPWRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LPWRX	JRLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	4.82%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.62%	9.88%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	11.96%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.12%	14.88%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	16.03%	+2.62%

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPWRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

LPWRX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

LPWRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
LPWRX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund	2.00%	2.26%	1.00%	2.07%	2.35%	9.34%	1.00%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LPWRX and JRLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, LPWRX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LPWRX or JRLVX?

LPWRX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to JRLVX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPWRX dropped -33.27% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.