PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JICDX vs. JAKVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JICDX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 9.88% return.


JICDX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.30%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
1.21%

JAKVX

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.16%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JICDX and JAKVX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JICDX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JICDX
JICDX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
JICDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JICDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JICDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
JICDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JICDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JICDXJAKVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.51

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.96

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

13.15

-10.45

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JICDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the JAKVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JICDX and JAKVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JICDX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JICDX and JAKVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JICDXJAKVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-5.16%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-5.16%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-3.65%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-0.85%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.55%

-0.40%

Volatility

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) is 1.06%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that JICDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JICDXJAKVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

2.82%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

6.32%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

7.79%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

7.55%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

7.55%

-2.55%

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JICDX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

JICDX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison

JICDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than JAKVX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.71%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JICDX
John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund
1.75%2.85%4.25%3.66%2.34%1.74%6.47%3.38%2.69%2.03%2.44%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


JICDX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAKVX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JICDX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JICDX dropped -18.94% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JICDX and JAKVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer