PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBEX vs. LSSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBEX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBEX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.


JIBEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
2.09%

LSSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.05%7.39%2.58%5.46%-9.24%-1.72%7.20%7.54%0.41%2.81%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
1.24%8.32%3.94%7.01%-11.82%0.64%4.68%6.81%2.48%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBEX and LSSAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2006

0.77

The correlation between JIBEX and LSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBEX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBEX
JIBEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSAX
LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBEXLSSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

4.05

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

13.79

-8.17

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBEX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBEXLSSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.13

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.25

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.58

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.95

-0.62

Drawdowns

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBEX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum LSSAX drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBEX and LSSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBEXLSSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-16.40%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-2.16%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-5.91%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.81%

-16.40%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.85%

-16.40%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.61%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-1.98%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.90%

-0.18%

Volatility

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) is 0.92%, while Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that JIBEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBEXLSSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.47%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

2.66%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73%

4.10%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

5.78%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

4.42%

-0.84%

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBEX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBEX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

JIBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than LSSAX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
3.68%4.03%3.39%2.90%2.14%1.79%3.15%2.69%2.74%2.33%2.39%1.54%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.34%4.23%4.54%5.65%6.47%6.38%5.95%5.48%5.62%5.42%5.12%5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBEX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSAX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to JIBEX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBEX dropped -13.85% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBEX and LSSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer