PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBEX vs. NCRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBEX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than NCRLX's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBEX has outperformed NCRLX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while NCRLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.85% annualized return.


JIBEX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.07%

NCRLX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.74%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
0.02%7.39%2.58%5.46%-9.24%-1.72%7.20%7.54%0.41%2.81%
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
0.39%7.24%1.90%5.69%-14.36%-1.07%9.50%9.43%-1.06%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBEX and NCRLX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000

0.83

The correlation between JIBEX and NCRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBEX vs. NCRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBEX
JIBEX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JIBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NCRLX
NCRLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NCRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NCRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBEXNCRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.67

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

4.74

-0.04

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the NCRLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBEX and NCRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBEX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum NCRLX drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBEX and NCRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBEXNCRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-19.21%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-2.93%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-6.39%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.81%

-19.21%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.85%

-19.21%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.94%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-3.81%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.03%

-0.24%

Volatility

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) is 1.00%, while Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that JIBEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBEXNCRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.25%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

2.99%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

4.01%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.40%

6.03%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

5.01%

-1.42%

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBEX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NCRLX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBEX vs. NCRLX - Dividend Comparison

JIBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than NCRLX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
3.68%4.03%3.39%2.90%2.14%1.79%3.15%2.69%2.74%2.33%2.39%1.54%
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
4.70%4.68%4.76%3.90%2.63%2.47%4.76%3.37%3.00%2.80%3.37%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBEX and NCRLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCRLX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to JIBEX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBEX dropped -13.85% vs NCRLX's -19.21%.

JIBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBEX and NCRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer