PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBEX vs. JIBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBEX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than JIBDX's 0.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JIBEX having a 2.09% annualized return and JIBDX not far ahead at 2.10%.


JIBEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
2.09%

JIBDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.68%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.05%7.39%2.58%5.46%-9.24%-1.72%7.20%7.54%0.41%2.81%
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
0.32%5.91%3.98%4.77%-4.29%-0.91%3.91%4.65%1.14%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBEX and JIBDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000

0.88

The correlation between JIBEX and JIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBEX vs. JIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBEX
JIBEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JIBDX
JIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) and Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBEXJIBDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.59

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.08

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

10.93

-5.31

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the JIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBEX and JIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBEXJIBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.69

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.91

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.18

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.46

-0.13

Drawdowns

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBEX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than JIBDX's maximum drawdown of -8.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBEX and JIBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBEXJIBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-8.51%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-1.19%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-1.19%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.81%

-6.87%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.85%

-6.95%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.53%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-2.48%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.33%

+0.39%

Volatility

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Volatility Comparison

Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund (JIBEX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) at 0.48%. This indicates that JIBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBEXJIBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.48%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

1.00%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73%

1.36%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

2.12%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

1.79%

+1.79%

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JIBEX and JIBDX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBEX vs. JIBDX - Dividend Comparison

JIBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, which matches JIBDX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
3.68%3.92%2.88%2.08%1.26%0.99%1.73%2.39%2.21%1.67%1.97%0.92%
JIBEX
Johnson Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund
3.68%4.03%3.39%2.90%2.14%1.79%3.15%2.69%2.74%2.33%2.39%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JIBEX and JIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIBEX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to JIBDX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBEX dropped -13.85% vs JIBDX's -8.51%.

JIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBEX and JIBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer