PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBDX vs. JMUNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) and Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBDX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than JMUNX's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBDX has outperformed JMUNX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while JMUNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.


JIBDX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.48%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
2.10%

JMUNX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.86%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.48%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
0.32%5.91%3.98%4.77%-4.29%-0.91%3.91%4.65%1.14%1.54%
JMUNX
Johnson Municipal Income Fund
1.30%3.71%-0.19%5.75%-8.10%0.30%5.12%5.66%0.90%3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBDX and JMUNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBDX vs. JMUNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBDX
JIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUNX
JMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) and Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBDXJMUNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.60

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.81

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

6.08

+3.42

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the JMUNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBDX and JMUNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum JMUNX drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBDX and JMUNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBDXJMUNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-13.08%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-3.51%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-7.20%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.87%

-13.08%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.95%

-13.08%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.79%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-2.65%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.04%

-0.68%

Volatility

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) is 0.53%, while Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) has a volatility of 0.62%. This indicates that JIBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBDXJMUNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

2.11%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

2.65%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.13%

4.12%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

3.97%

-2.18%

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMUNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Dividend Comparison

JIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than JMUNX's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
3.68%3.92%2.88%2.08%1.26%0.99%1.73%2.39%2.21%1.67%1.97%0.92%
JMUNX
Johnson Municipal Income Fund
2.61%3.49%2.41%2.79%2.30%1.96%1.93%2.00%1.88%1.86%1.83%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBDX and JMUNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMUNX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to JIBDX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBDX dropped -8.51% vs JMUNX's -13.08%.

JIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBDX and JMUNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer