JIBDX vs. JMUNX
JIBDX (Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund) and JMUNX (Johnson Municipal Income Fund) are both mutual funds - JIBDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Johnson Mutual Funds, while JMUNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Johnson Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, JIBDX returned 2.10%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for JMUNX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JIBDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for JMUNX.
Performance
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIBDX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than JMUNX's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBDX has outperformed JMUNX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while JMUNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.
JIBDX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
JMUNX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 6.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBDX Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.32% | 5.91% | 3.98% | 4.77% | -4.29% | -0.91% | 3.91% | 4.65% | 1.14% | 1.54% |
JMUNX Johnson Municipal Income Fund | 1.30% | 3.71% | -0.19% | 5.75% | -8.10% | 0.30% | 5.12% | 5.66% | 0.90% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between JIBDX and JMUNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JIBDX vs. JMUNX — Risk / Return Rank
JIBDX
JMUNX
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) and Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JIBDX | JMUNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.60 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.81 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 6.08 | +3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum JMUNX drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBDX and JMUNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIBDX | JMUNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -13.08% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -3.51% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.19% | -7.20% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.87% | -13.08% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.95% | -13.08% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.79% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -2.65% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.04% | -0.68% |
Volatility
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) is 0.53%, while Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) has a volatility of 0.62%. This indicates that JIBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JIBDX | JMUNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 0.62% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 2.11% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38% | 2.65% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 4.12% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 3.97% | -2.18% |
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIBDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMUNX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
JIBDX vs. JMUNX - Dividend Comparison
JIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than JMUNX's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBDX Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.68% | 3.92% | 2.88% | 2.08% | 1.26% | 0.99% | 1.73% | 2.39% | 2.21% | 1.67% | 1.97% | 0.92% |
JMUNX Johnson Municipal Income Fund | 2.61% | 3.49% | 2.41% | 2.79% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 2.00% | 1.88% | 1.86% | 1.83% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JIBDX and JMUNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMUNX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to JIBDX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBDX dropped -8.51% vs JMUNX's -13.08%.
JIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JIBDX and JMUNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer