JIBDX vs. JIBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) and Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX).
JIBDX is managed by Johnson Mutual Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2000. JIBFX is managed by Johnson Mutual Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2000.
Performance
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBDX Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund | -0.14% | 5.91% | 3.98% | 4.77% | -4.29% | -0.91% | 3.91% | 4.65% | 1.14% | 1.54% |
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund | -0.55% | 7.87% | 1.21% | 5.43% | -13.69% | -2.04% | 9.71% | 8.95% | 0.10% | 3.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIBDX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly higher than JIBFX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBDX has outperformed JIBFX with an annualized return of 2.11%, while JIBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.
JIBDX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
JIBFX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JIBDX and JIBFX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JIBDX vs. JIBFX — Risk / Return Rank
JIBDX
JIBFX
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) and Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIBDX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.67 | 0.91 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.09 | 1.30 | +2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.16 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 1.64 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.68 | 4.92 | +13.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIBDX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 0.91 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.03 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | 0.36 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.24 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIBDX and JIBFX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Dividend Comparison
JIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than JIBFX's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBDX Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.65% | 3.92% | 2.88% | 2.08% | 1.26% | 0.99% | 1.73% | 2.39% | 2.21% | 1.67% | 1.97% | 0.92% |
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund | 3.55% | 3.85% | 3.69% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 1.75% | 3.11% | 2.76% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 3.03% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum JIBFX drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBDX and JIBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIBDX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -19.54% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -3.02% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.87% | -18.96% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.95% | -19.54% | +12.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -3.60% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -5.18% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 1.01% | -0.79% |
Volatility
JIBDX vs. JIBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) is 0.61%, while Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that JIBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIBDX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 1.69% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 2.77% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 4.69% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.11% | 6.52% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.78% | 5.31% | -3.53% |