PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMNIX vs. RFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMNIX vs. RFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMNIX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than RFM's 8.81% return.


TMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.95%
6M
0.04%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.54%

RFM

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.37%
6M
4.65%
YTD
8.81%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
-1.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$120.06K$124.16K$157.09K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMNIX vs. RFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
0.40%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.28%
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
8.81%1.59%3.24%6.50%-22.85%10.85%15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TMNIX and RFM is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.19

The correlation between TMNIX and RFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMNIX vs. RFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

RFM
RFM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMNIX vs. RFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMNIXRFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.46

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

7.77

-1.90

TMNIX vs. RFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the RFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMNIX and RFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMNIX vs. RFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMNIX drawdown since its inception was -4.63%, smaller than the maximum RFM drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMNIX and RFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMNIXRFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-35.49%

+30.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-5.83%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.61%

-18.28%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.61%

-35.49%

+30.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-10.66%

+8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-14.60%

+13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.84%

-0.97%

Volatility

TMNIX vs. RFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) is 0.78%, while RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund (RFM) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that TMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMNIXRFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.84%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

7.45%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

9.33%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

12.84%

-9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

12.59%

-9.91%

TMNIX vs. RFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RFM's 5.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMNIX vs. RFM - Dividend Comparison

TMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than RFM's 7.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
7.46%8.07%7.70%7.64%8.38%10.49%5.07%0.00%0.00%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.48%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMNIX and RFM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFM has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to TMNIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMNIX dropped -4.63% vs RFM's -35.49%.

TMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMNIX and RFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer