JHSC vs. PBW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while PBW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.89%/yr vs -15.46%/yr for PBW. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.

Performance

JHSC vs. PBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than PBW's 5.86% return.

JHSC

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 15.31%
• 1Y: 24.76%
• 3Y*: 12.62%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.97%

PBW

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -12.22%
• 6M: -4.18%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 1Y: 46.40%
• 3Y*: -7.64%
• 5Y*: -15.46%
• 10Y*: 7.09%
• ALL TIME*: -2.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF	$4.07M	$3.28M	$2.18M
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	$37.14M	$32.16M	$36.05M

JHSC vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF	15.31%	6.88%	9.74%	20.77%	-14.65%	19.55%	11.60%	24.43%	-12.50%	4.48%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	5.86%	53.96%	-30.77%	-20.03%	-44.55%	-29.86%	204.82%	62.58%	-14.11%	1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JHSC and PBW is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.70

The correlation between JHSC and PBW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHSC vs. PBW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHSC	PBW
Financial Services	18.6%	1.4%
Industrials	17.0%	25.7%
Technology	14.8%	23.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	15.3%
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Real Estate	6.2%	-
Energy	6.1%	3.9%
Basic Materials	5.1%	16.3%
Utilities	3.8%	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.8%	-

Return for Risk

JHSC vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHSC

JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 64
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PBW

PBW Risk / Return Rank: 38
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHSC vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHSC	PBW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	0.98	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.49	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.20	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.46	3.64	+4.82

JHSC vs. PBW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the PBW Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHSC and PBW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHSC vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and PBW.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHSC	PBW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.66%	-89.02%	+46.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-36.09%	+26.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.16%	-65.32%	+40.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.21%	-84.50%	+59.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-73.32%	+72.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-62.94%	+55.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	11.82%	-9.09%

Volatility

JHSC vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 3.42%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 14.90%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHSC	PBW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	14.90%	-11.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	33.63%	-22.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	44.14%	-28.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.05%	43.61%	-23.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.07%	39.25%	-17.18%

JHSC vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHSC vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison

JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than PBW's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.01%	1.13%	0.96%	0.98%	1.13%	1.08%	1.12%	1.14%	1.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	1.47%	0.79%	2.84%	3.68%	4.21%	1.71%	0.44%	1.45%	2.04%	1.28%	2.68%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHSC and PBW in my portfolio?

JHSC and PBW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHSC or PBW?

PBW has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to JHSC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs PBW's -89.02%.

Which ETF is better, JHSC or PBW?

On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.89% vs -15.46% for PBW. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHSC or PBW?

Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.89% return vs -15.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHSC or PBW?

JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHSC or PBW?

PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.

What is the main difference between JHSC and PBW?

JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while PBW is Alternative Energy Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.61% for PBW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.