JHPI vs. JHCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHPI (John Hancock Preferred Income ETF) and JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHPI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHPI returned 9.01%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for JHCB. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHPI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JHCB.

Performance

JHPI vs. JHCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHPI achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than JHCB's 0.37% return.

JHPI

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 8.04%
• 3Y*: 9.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHCB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: -0.08%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHPI vs. JHCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF	1.67%	7.37%	10.54%	7.25%	-9.55%	0.62%
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF	0.37%	8.02%	2.75%	8.89%	-15.93%	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JHPI and JHCB is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.51

The correlation between JHPI and JHCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHPI vs. JHCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHPI

JHPI Risk / Return Rank: 68
JHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
JHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 79
JHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
JHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 57

JHCB

JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 37
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHPI vs. JHCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHPI	JHCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.30	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	1.89	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.23	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	1.81	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.96	5.94	+4.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHPI vs. JHCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the JHCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHPI and JHCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHPI	JHCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.30	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.15	+0.45

Drawdowns

JHPI vs. JHCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHPI drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, smaller than the maximum JHCB drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHPI and JHCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHPI	JHCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-22.61%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-3.16%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.26%	-6.54%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-1.04%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-8.21%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	0.96%	-0.15%

Volatility

JHPI vs. JHCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) is 1.02%, while John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JHPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHPI	JHCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.42%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.51%	3.25%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37%	4.41%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.30%	6.95%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.30%	6.88%	-0.58%

JHPI vs. JHCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHPI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCB's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHPI vs. JHCB - Dividend Comparison

JHPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than JHCB's 4.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF	4.96%	4.92%	5.02%	4.35%	3.86%	2.41%
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF	5.80%	5.73%	6.32%	6.44%	6.27%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHPI and JHCB in my portfolio?

JHPI and JHCB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHPI or JHCB?

JHCB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JHPI (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHPI dropped -13.45% vs JHCB's -22.61%.

Which ETF is better, JHPI or JHCB?

On 3-year performance, JHPI leads with 9.01% vs 5.68% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHPI or JHCB?

Over the 3-year period, JHPI has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHPI or JHCB?

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for JHPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHPI or JHCB?

JHPI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 4.96% for JHCB.

What is the main difference between JHPI and JHCB?

JHPI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while JHCB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for JHPI and 0.29% for JHCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.