JHMU vs. IBMP
JHMU (John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMP (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - JHMU tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Utilities Index while IBMP tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, JHMU returned 7.41% vs 3.02% for IBMP. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHMU charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMP.
Performance
JHMU vs. IBMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMU achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than IBMP's 0.93% return.
JHMU
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMU vs. IBMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF | 1.83% | 5.03% | 3.76% | 7.77% |
IBMP iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.93% | 3.52% | 1.26% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMU and IBMP is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between JHMU and IBMP shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMU vs. IBMP — Risk / Return Rank
JHMU
IBMP
JHMU vs. IBMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMU | IBMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.60 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 5.10 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | 14.14 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMU | IBMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.81 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 0.38 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
JHMU vs. IBMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMU drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum IBMP drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMU and IBMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMU | IBMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -15.24% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -0.59% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | 0.00% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -2.72% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.21% | +0.56% |
Volatility
JHMU vs. IBMP - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) at 0.27%. This indicates that JHMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMU | IBMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 0.27% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 0.79% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 1.08% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 2.56% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 5.00% | -0.89% |
JHMU vs. IBMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMU has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMP's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMU vs. IBMP - Dividend Comparison
JHMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than IBMP's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMP iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.50% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 1.26% | 0.86% | 1.16% | 1.06% |
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF | 3.72% | 4.36% | 7.29% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMU and IBMP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHMU has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to IBMP (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMU dropped -4.48% vs IBMP's -15.24%.
On 1-year performance, JHMU leads with 7.41% vs 3.02% for IBMP. On fees, IBMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMP has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHMU has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMU.
JHMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.50% for IBMP.
JHMU tracks John Hancock Dimensional Utilities Index, while IBMP tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Callable Factor Adjusted 2027 Series Index. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMU and 0.18% for IBMP.
IBMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMU and IBMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer