PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMPX vs. FMUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JHMPX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMPX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than FMUAX's 5.65% return.


JHMPX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.80%
6M
2.64%
YTD
4.06%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.75%

FMUAX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.69%
6M
4.11%
YTD
5.65%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
5.95%
ALL TIME*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMPX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
4.06%12.39%7.13%12.20%-15.10%7.25%12.07%15.97%-3.58%5.94%
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
5.65%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%10.32%8.48%15.16%-5.24%10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMPX and FMUAX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.83

The correlation between JHMPX and FMUAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMPX vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHMPX
JHMPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JHMPX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMPXFMUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.17

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

15.09

-6.84

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FMUAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMPX and FMUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMPX drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum FMUAX drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMPX and FMUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMPXFMUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-22.43%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-4.94%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.00%

-10.18%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-15.93%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.92%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-2.74%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.97%

+0.26%

Volatility

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JHMPX) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) at 1.68%. This indicates that JHMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMPXFMUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

1.68%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

4.95%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.13%

6.38%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

7.21%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

8.14%

-0.12%

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMPX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMPX vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison

JHMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than FMUAX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.30%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%
JHMPX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
5.62%5.85%4.81%10.70%11.76%6.67%5.55%4.38%4.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMPX and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHMPX has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to FMUAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMPX dropped -20.52% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMPX and FMUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer