JHMB vs. OILK
JHMB (John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. JHMB is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHMB returned 5.16%/yr vs 9.71%/yr for OILK. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. JHMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for OILK.
Performance
JHMB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 47.49% return.
JHMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.28%
OILK
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 37.83%
- YTD
- 47.49%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $656.90K | $672.97K | $838.26K | |
| $8.74M | $7.86M | $10.67M |
JHMB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF | -0.01% | 7.89% | 3.52% | 7.21% | -10.24% | -0.88% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF | 47.49% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 18.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMB and OILK is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021 | -0.16 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JHMB and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.16 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
JHMB
OILK
JHMB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.59 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 4.49 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHMB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -83.76% | +69.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -21.19% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | -23.42% | +18.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -13.47% | +11.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -32.27% | +27.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 7.52% | -6.30% |
Volatility
JHMB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) is 1.02%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that JHMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 11.95% | -10.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 26.22% | -23.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 30.24% | -26.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 30.48% | -24.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 36.00% | -30.25% |
JHMB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than OILK's 11.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF | 4.85% | 4.48% | 4.88% | 4.04% | 4.17% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF | 11.51% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMB and OILK have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to JHMB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMB dropped -14.53% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 9.71% vs 5.16% for JHMB. On fees, JHMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 11.51%, compared with 4.85% for JHMB.
JHMB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.69% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMB and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer