PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMB vs. JHCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMB vs. JHCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than JHCP's 0.53% return.


JHMB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.78%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
10Y*

JHCP

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.57%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMB vs. JHCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
0.59%7.89%0.41%
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
0.53%7.59%-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMB and JHCP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.75

The correlation between JHMB and JHCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMB vs. JHCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMB
JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCP
JHCP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JHCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMB vs. JHCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMBJHCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.48

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

2.20

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.16

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.29

6.24

+0.05

JHMB vs. JHCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the JHCP Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMB and JHCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMBJHCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.48

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.12

-0.86

Drawdowns

JHMB vs. JHCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than JHCP's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and JHCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMBJHCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-3.06%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-2.82%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.37%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-0.80%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.98%

+0.05%

Volatility

JHMB vs. JHCP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) is 1.18%, while John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that JHMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMBJHCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.35%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

3.07%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

4.27%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

4.84%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

4.84%

+0.97%

JHMB vs. JHCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMB vs. JHCP - Dividend Comparison

JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than JHCP's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
4.65%4.79%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
4.72%4.48%4.88%4.04%4.17%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMB and JHCP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCP has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to JHMB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMB dropped -14.53% vs JHCP's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, JHMB leads with 6.60% vs 6.30% for JHCP. On fees, JHCP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, JHMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHMB has performed better with a 6.60% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMB.

JHMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.65% for JHCP.

Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.36% for JHCP.

JHMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMB and JHCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer