PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMB vs. JHCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMB vs. JHCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than JHCB's -1.01% return.


JHMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.24%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.24%

JHCB

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.01%
1Y
1.55%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$496.05K$369.71K$346.04K
$682.94K$785.88K$842.54K

JHMB vs. JHCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
-0.24%7.89%3.52%7.21%-10.24%-0.88%
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
-1.01%8.02%2.75%8.89%-15.93%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMB and JHCB is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021

0.67

The correlation between JHMB and JHCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMB vs. JHCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHMB
JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHMB vs. JHCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMBJHCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.64

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

1.87

+1.55

JHMB vs. JHCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the JHCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMB and JHCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMB vs. JHCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum JHCB drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and JHCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMBJHCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-22.61%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-3.16%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-5.47%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.40%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-7.99%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.08%

+0.13%

Volatility

JHMB vs. JHCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) is 1.02%, while John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that JHMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMBJHCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.09%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

3.46%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

4.30%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

6.94%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

6.81%

-1.06%

JHMB vs. JHCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMB vs. JHCB - Dividend Comparison

JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than JHCB's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
5.13%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
4.86%4.48%4.88%4.04%4.17%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMB and JHCB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCB has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to JHMB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMB dropped -14.53% vs JHCB's -22.61%.

On 3-year performance, JHMB leads with 5.17% vs 5.05% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JHMB has performed better with a 5.17% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMB.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.86% for JHMB.

JHMB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while JHCB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.29% for JHCB.

JHMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMB and JHCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer