JHMB vs. JHLN
JHMB (John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF) and JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JHMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JHLN.
Performance
JHMB vs. JHLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than JHLN's 1.29% return.
JHMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.28%
JHLN
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $841.58K | $913.34K | $636.31K | |
| $656.90K | $672.97K | $838.26K |
JHMB vs. JHLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF | -0.01% | 3.59% |
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.29% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMB and JHLN is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMB vs. JHLN — Risk / Return Rank
JHMB
JHLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHMB vs. JHLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHMB | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHMB vs. JHLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than JHLN's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and JHLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMB | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -1.46% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -0.05% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -0.29% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility
JHMB vs. JHLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMB | JHLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 2.64% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 2.64% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 2.64% | +3.11% |
JHMB vs. JHLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JHLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMB vs. JHLN - Dividend Comparison
JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, which matches JHLN's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 4.89% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF | 4.85% | 4.48% | 4.88% | 4.04% | 4.17% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMB and JHLN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.
JHLN has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 4.85% for JHMB.
JHMB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while JHLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.59% for JHLN.
Find the right allocation for JHMB and JHLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer