JHLN vs. LVLN
JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) and LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. JHLN is actively managed, while LVLN is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHLN charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVLN.
Performance
JHLN vs. LVLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHLN achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than LVLN's 1.73% return.
JHLN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVLN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHLN vs. LVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.09% | 0.92% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 1.73% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHLN and LVLN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHLN vs. LVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN) and SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHLN vs. LVLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHLN drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum LVLN drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHLN and LVLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHLN | LVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -2.34% | +0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.48% | +0.19% |
Volatility
JHLN vs. LVLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHLN | LVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 2.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 2.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 2.65% | -0.06% |
JHLN vs. LVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHLN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LVLN's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHLN vs. LVLN - Dividend Comparison
JHLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, which matches LVLN's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 4.30% | 1.88% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 4.30% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHLN and LVLN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.
JHLN and LVLN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.30%.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JHLN and 0.40% for LVLN.
Find the right allocation for JHLN and LVLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer