JHMB vs. EUSB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHMB (John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. JHMB is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHMB returned 5.24%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for EUSB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.

Performance

JHMB vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.13% return.

JHMB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 6.77%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUSB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMB vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	0.36%	7.89%	3.52%	7.21%	-10.24%	-0.79%
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF	0.13%	7.45%	1.83%	5.80%	-12.81%	-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMB and EUSB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2021	0.70

The correlation between JHMB and EUSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JHMB vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMB

JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 49
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 50
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EUSB

EUSB Risk / Return Rank: 41
EUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
EUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMB vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMB	EUSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.45	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.19	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	2.09	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	6.26	+0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMB vs. EUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EUSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMB and EUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMB	EUSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.45	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.04	+0.20

Drawdowns

JHMB vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and EUSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMB	EUSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-17.87%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-2.48%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.80%	-5.76%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-1.36%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-6.50%	+1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.82%	+0.21%

Volatility

JHMB vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) have volatilities of 1.16% and 1.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMB	EUSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	1.17%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	2.49%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	3.57%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.81%	5.77%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.81%	5.41%	+0.40%

JHMB vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMB vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison

JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF	3.97%	3.84%	3.67%	3.08%	2.21%	1.10%	0.57%
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	4.73%	4.48%	4.88%	4.04%	4.17%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMB and EUSB in my portfolio?

JHMB and EUSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMB or EUSB?

EUSB has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to JHMB (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMB dropped -14.53% vs EUSB's -17.87%.

Which ETF is better, JHMB or EUSB?

On 3-year performance, JHMB leads with 5.24% vs 4.27% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMB or EUSB?

Over the 3-year period, JHMB has performed better with a 5.24% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMB or EUSB?

EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMB or EUSB?

JHMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.

What is the main difference between JHMB and EUSB?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.12% for EUSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.