JHMB vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JHMB (John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. JHMB is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHMB returned 5.32%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for VTV. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

JHMB vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMB achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.28% return.

JHMB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 5.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.90%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMB vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	0.59%	7.89%	3.52%	7.21%	-10.24%	-0.79%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	12.28%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMB and VTV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2021	0.08

The correlation between JHMB and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JHMB vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMB

JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 46
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 81
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMB vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMB	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.67	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.82	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.48	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	4.27	-2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.29	16.15	-9.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMB vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMB and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMB	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.67	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.51	-0.26

Drawdowns

JHMB vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMB drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMB and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMB	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-59.27%	+44.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-6.35%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.80%	-14.52%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	0.00%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-7.87%	+3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.68%	-0.65%

Volatility

JHMB vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) is 1.18%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that JHMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMB	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	2.65%	-1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	7.59%	-4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	10.11%	-6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.81%	13.88%	-8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.81%	16.67%	-10.86%

JHMB vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMB vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

JHMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	4.72%	4.48%	4.88%	4.04%	4.17%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMB and VTV in my portfolio?

JHMB and VTV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMB or VTV?

VTV has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to JHMB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMB dropped -14.53% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, JHMB or VTV?

On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 18.27% vs 5.32% for JHMB. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JHMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMB or VTV?

Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 18.27% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMB or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMB or VTV?

JHMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

What is the main difference between JHMB and VTV?

JHMB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMB and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.