JHID vs. DFIV

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHID returned 19.89%/yr vs 22.61%/yr for DFIV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHID charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

JHID vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JHID having a 14.13% return and DFIV slightly lower at 13.64%.

JHID

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 11.63%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 1Y: 30.06%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 11.15%
• YTD: 13.64%
• 1Y: 32.87%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHID vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	14.13%	41.47%	3.62%	19.47%	-0.42%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	13.64%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between JHID and DFIV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2022	0.95

The correlation between JHID and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHID vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHID	DFIV
Financial Services	28.6%	32.4%
Industrials	15.7%	9.8%
Technology	9.6%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	4.9%
Basic Materials	6.6%	11.4%
Healthcare	6.4%	4.9%
Energy	6.0%	15.3%
Utilities	5.8%	2.2%
Real Estate	5.8%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	10.0%
Communication Services	2.8%	4.3%

Return for Risk

JHID vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHID

JHID Risk / Return Rank: 87
JHID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
JHID Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
JHID Omega Ratio Rank: 87
JHID Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
JHID Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 86
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHID vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHID	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.35	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.23	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	3.42	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	13.00	+0.69

JHID vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHID Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHID and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHID vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHID drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHID and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHID	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.42%	-25.42%	+13.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.42%	-9.66%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.42%	-14.72%	+2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-4.41%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	2.54%	-0.33%

Volatility

JHID vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHID	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	3.23%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	11.62%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	14.08%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	16.58%	-2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	16.58%	-2.67%

JHID vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHID has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHID vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

JHID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than DFIV's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.65%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	3.44%	3.13%	5.15%	5.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHID and DFIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, JHID and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JHID or DFIV?

DFIV has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to JHID (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHID dropped -12.42% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, JHID or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 22.61% vs 19.89% for JHID. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHID or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 22.61% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHID or DFIV?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JHID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHID or DFIV?

JHID has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.65% for DFIV.

What is the main difference between JHID and DFIV?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for JHID and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.