PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHEM vs. JPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHEM vs. JPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHEM achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly higher than JPEM's 7.27% return.


JHEM

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.18%
YTD
25.02%
6M
28.35%
1Y
49.16%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*

JPEM

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.61%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHEM vs. JPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
25.02%30.49%4.58%12.94%-17.90%2.10%11.50%17.68%-7.41%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.27%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%8.11%-0.46%16.21%-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JHEM and JPEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.89

The correlation between JHEM and JPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHEM vs. JPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHEM
JPEM

Technology

26.5%
6.7%

Financial Services

21.9%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
10.0%

Basic Materials

8.6%
11.3%

Industrials

8.4%
13.1%

Communication Services

7.5%
8.4%

Energy

5.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

3.0%
4.3%

Utilities

2.9%
9.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.8%

Technology

JHEM
26.5%
JPEM
6.7%

Financial Services

JHEM
21.9%
JPEM
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JHEM
11.7%
JPEM
10.0%

Basic Materials

JHEM
8.6%
JPEM
11.3%

Industrials

JHEM
8.4%
JPEM
13.1%

Communication Services

JHEM
7.5%
JPEM
8.4%

Energy

JHEM
5.3%
JPEM
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

JHEM
3.5%
JPEM
8.6%

Healthcare

JHEM
3.0%
JPEM
4.3%

Utilities

JHEM
2.9%
JPEM
9.2%

Real Estate

JHEM
0.6%
JPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHEM vs. JPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHEM
JHEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JHEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JHEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHEM vs. JPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHEMJPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.14

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

8.02

+7.50

JHEM vs. JPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the JPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHEM and JPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHEMJPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.71

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.45

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.33

+0.12

Drawdowns

JHEM vs. JPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHEM drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, smaller than the maximum JPEM drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHEM and JPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHEMJPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.99%

-40.22%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-10.32%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-14.30%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-21.57%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-3.01%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-9.47%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.76%

+0.42%

Volatility

JHEM vs. JPEM - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) at 4.38%. This indicates that JHEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHEMJPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

4.38%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

11.22%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

12.96%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

13.49%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

17.04%

+3.56%

JHEM vs. JPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHEM vs. JPEM - Dividend Comparison

JHEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than JPEM's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.91%2.39%2.93%2.87%2.84%2.71%1.67%2.37%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.40%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHEM and JPEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHEM has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to JPEM (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHEM dropped -34.99% vs JPEM's -40.22%.

On 5-year performance, JHEM leads with 7.90% vs 6.05% for JPEM. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHEM has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.91% for JHEM.

JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHEM and 0.44% for JPEM.

JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHEM and JPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer