PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHEM vs. FEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHEM vs. FEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHEM achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly higher than FEM's 20.27% return.


JHEM

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.18%
YTD
25.02%
6M
28.35%
1Y
49.16%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*

FEM

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
20.27%
6M
22.14%
1Y
41.40%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHEM vs. FEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
25.02%30.49%4.58%12.94%-17.90%2.10%11.50%17.68%-7.41%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
20.27%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JHEM and FEM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.84

The correlation between JHEM and FEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHEM vs. FEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHEM
FEM

Technology

26.5%
24.5%

Financial Services

21.9%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
5.7%

Basic Materials

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.4%
20.9%

Communication Services

7.5%
4.6%

Energy

5.3%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.8%

Healthcare

3.0%
3.1%

Utilities

2.9%
6.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.5%

Technology

JHEM
26.5%
FEM
24.5%

Financial Services

JHEM
21.9%
FEM
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JHEM
11.7%
FEM
5.7%

Basic Materials

JHEM
8.6%
FEM
8.6%

Industrials

JHEM
8.4%
FEM
20.9%

Communication Services

JHEM
7.5%
FEM
4.6%

Energy

JHEM
5.3%
FEM
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

JHEM
3.5%
FEM
2.8%

Healthcare

JHEM
3.0%
FEM
3.1%

Utilities

JHEM
2.9%
FEM
6.2%

Real Estate

JHEM
0.6%
FEM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHEM vs. FEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHEM
JHEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JHEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JHEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHEM vs. FEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHEMFEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

4.47

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

16.89

-1.37

JHEM vs. FEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the FEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHEM and FEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHEMFEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.39

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.40

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.19

+0.26

Drawdowns

JHEM vs. FEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHEM drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, smaller than the maximum FEM drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHEM and FEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHEMFEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.99%

-46.23%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-9.31%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-18.79%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-31.72%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.59%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-15.04%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.46%

+0.72%

Volatility

JHEM vs. FEM - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) at 6.05%. This indicates that JHEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHEMFEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

6.05%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

14.47%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

17.39%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

18.39%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

20.96%

-0.36%

JHEM vs. FEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHEM vs. FEM - Dividend Comparison

JHEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than FEM's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.91%2.39%2.93%2.87%2.84%2.71%1.67%2.37%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHEM and FEM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHEM has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to FEM (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHEM dropped -34.99% vs FEM's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, JHEM leads with 7.90% vs 7.31% for FEM. On fees, JHEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHEM has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.

FEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.91% for JHEM.

JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHEM and 0.80% for FEM.

JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHEM and FEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer