JHCR vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHCR (John Hancock Core Bond ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JHCR returned 5.73% vs 38.68% for BCI. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. JHCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

JHCR vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCR achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.

JHCR

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: 5.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCR vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF	0.32%	7.54%	-0.28%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCR and BCI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	-0.17

Return for Risk

JHCR vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCR

JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 40
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCR vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHCR	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.30	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.92	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.41	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	5.10	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	13.14	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHCR vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCR and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHCR	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.30	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.48	+0.63

Drawdowns

JHCR vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCR drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCR and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHCR	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-32.69%	+29.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-7.61%	+4.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-4.52%	+2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-12.00%	+11.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.95%	-2.02%

Volatility

JHCR vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) is 1.51%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that JHCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHCR	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	5.16%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.11%	14.80%	-11.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.19%	16.92%	-12.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	16.82%	-12.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.69%	15.65%	-10.96%

JHCR vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHCR vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

JHCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than BCI's 13.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF	4.24%	4.65%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHCR and BCI in my portfolio?

JHCR and BCI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHCR or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to JHCR (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCR dropped -2.85% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, JHCR or BCI?

On 1-year performance, BCI leads with 38.68% vs 5.73% for JHCR. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JHCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHCR or BCI?

Over the 1-year period, BCI has performed better with a 38.68% return vs 5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHCR or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHCR or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 4.24% for JHCR.

What is the main difference between JHCR and BCI?

JHCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCR and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.