JHCP vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHCP (John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JHCP returned 6.12% vs 17.02% for TDVG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHCP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

JHCP vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 7.48% return.

JHCP

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCP vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JHCP John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF	0.33%	7.59%	-0.30%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	7.48%	14.80%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCP and TDVG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.28

Return for Risk

JHCP vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCP

JHCP Risk / Return Rank: 41
JHCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JHCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
JHCP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
JHCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
JHCP Martin Ratio Rank: 40

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 51
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCP vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHCP	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.77	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.54	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.36	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.24	9.68	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHCP vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCP and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHCP	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.77	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.94	+0.14

Drawdowns

JHCP vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCP drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCP and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHCP	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-19.20%	+16.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-7.24%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-0.19%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-3.76%	+2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	1.76%	-0.78%

Volatility

JHCP vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) is 1.37%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that JHCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHCP	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	2.11%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.04%	7.45%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27%	9.67%	-5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	13.91%	-9.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.83%	13.93%	-9.10%

JHCP vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHCP vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

JHCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JHCP John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF	4.66%	4.79%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHCP and TDVG in my portfolio?

JHCP and TDVG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHCP or TDVG?

TDVG has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to JHCP (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCP dropped -3.06% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, JHCP or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, TDVG leads with 17.02% vs 6.12% for JHCP. On fees, JHCP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, JHCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHCP or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 17.02% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHCP or TDVG?

JHCP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHCP or TDVG?

JHCP has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.

What is the main difference between JHCP and TDVG?

JHCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while TDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for JHCP and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.