PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCB vs. JHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCB vs. JHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JHCB

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.01%
1Y
1.55%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.72%

JHDG

1D
1.56%
1M
2.75%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$496.05K$369.71K$346.04K
$1.27M$1.09M$1.11M

JHCB vs. JHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and JHDG is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCB vs. JHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

JHDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHCB vs. JHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCBJHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

JHCB vs. JHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. JHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHDG's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCBJHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-3.25%

-19.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

0.00%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-0.70%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

Volatility

JHCB vs. JHDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCBJHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

11.74%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

11.74%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

11.74%

-4.93%

JHCB vs. JHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHDG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCB vs. JHDG - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than JHDG's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
5.13%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCB and JHDG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHDG.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.10% for JHDG.

JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHDG is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.49% for JHDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer