JHCB vs. JHDG
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and JHDG (John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHDG is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for JHDG.
Performance
JHCB vs. JHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JHCB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 1Y
- 1.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.72%
JHDG
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $496.05K | $369.71K | $346.04K | |
| $1.27M | $1.09M | $1.11M |
JHCB vs. JHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | -0.86% |
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and JHDG is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. JHDG — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
JHDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHCB vs. JHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCB | JHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. JHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHDG's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | JHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -3.25% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | 0.00% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -0.70% | -7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility
JHCB vs. JHDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | JHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 11.74% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 11.74% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 11.74% | -4.93% |
JHCB vs. JHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHDG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCB vs. JHDG - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than JHDG's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 5.13% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% |
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and JHDG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHDG.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.10% for JHDG.
JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHDG is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.49% for JHDG.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer