PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BIMBX vs. FABZX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIMBX and FABZX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BIMBX vs. FABZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.80%
0.58%
BIMBX
FABZX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIMBX:

2.02

FABZX:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

BIMBX:

3.07

FABZX:

0.58

Omega Ratio

BIMBX:

1.39

FABZX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

BIMBX:

2.63

FABZX:

0.53

Martin Ratio

BIMBX:

7.12

FABZX:

1.67

Ulcer Index

BIMBX:

1.03%

FABZX:

3.36%

Daily Std Dev

BIMBX:

3.63%

FABZX:

12.86%

Max Drawdown

BIMBX:

-8.73%

FABZX:

-14.58%

Current Drawdown

BIMBX:

-0.75%

FABZX:

-9.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMBX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than FABZX's 1.28% return.


BIMBX

YTD

1.68%

1M

2.09%

6M

1.80%

1Y

7.64%

5Y*

4.04%

10Y*

N/A

FABZX

YTD

1.28%

1M

0.82%

6M

0.58%

1Y

5.61%

5Y*

0.98%

10Y*

1.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIMBX vs. FABZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMBX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than FABZX's 1.95% expense ratio.


FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
Expense ratio chart for FABZX: current value at 1.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.95%
Expense ratio chart for BIMBX: current value at 0.98% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.98%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIMBX vs. FABZX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIMBX is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FABZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FABZX is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FABZX is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FABZX is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FABZX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FABZX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FABZX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIMBX vs. FABZX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIMBX, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.020.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIMBX, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.070.58
The chart of Omega ratio for BIMBX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.391.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIMBX, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.630.53
The chart of Martin ratio for BIMBX, currently valued at 7.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.007.121.67
BIMBX
FABZX

The current BIMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FABZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMBX and FABZX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.02
0.44
BIMBX
FABZX

Dividends

BIMBX vs. FABZX - Dividend Comparison

BIMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FABZX's 6.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
4.01%4.08%4.47%4.90%1.72%1.70%4.19%3.02%2.18%1.70%1.23%0.00%
FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
6.53%6.61%0.70%2.24%0.75%0.00%0.85%0.00%1.56%0.77%1.54%0.89%

Drawdowns

BIMBX vs. FABZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, smaller than the maximum FABZX drawdown of -14.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMBX and FABZX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.75%
-9.45%
BIMBX
FABZX

Volatility

BIMBX vs. FABZX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.20%
1.16%
BIMBX
FABZX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab