PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMBX vs. HMEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMBX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than HMEZX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMBX has underperformed HMEZX with an annualized return of 4.53%, while HMEZX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.98% annualized return.


BIMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.15%
1Y
1.78%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
4.53%

HMEZX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.83%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
0.10%5.00%6.83%6.43%-2.95%6.18%3.57%8.43%1.83%9.89%
HMEZX
NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund
1.78%6.30%7.42%4.10%2.70%5.37%8.46%8.10%5.92%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMBX and HMEZX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMBX vs. HMEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMBX
BIMBX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BIMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HMEZX
HMEZX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HMEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIMBXHMEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

2.08

-0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

9.95

-9.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

53.69

-52.70

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the HMEZX Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMBX and HMEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, which is greater than HMEZX's maximum drawdown of -6.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMBX and HMEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMBXHMEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-6.86%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-0.55%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-1.06%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.50%

-1.94%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.73%

-6.86%

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-0.04%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.37%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

0.10%

+1.99%

Volatility

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX) at 0.43%. This indicates that BIMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMBXHMEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.43%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

0.91%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

1.28%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

1.67%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

3.79%

-0.20%

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMBX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than HMEZX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMBX vs. HMEZX - Dividend Comparison

BIMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than HMEZX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
2.27%2.27%4.07%4.48%4.99%2.62%1.31%3.90%8.93%4.08%5.00%
HMEZX
NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund
5.08%5.04%6.36%5.07%5.11%3.63%5.83%0.33%19.16%6.88%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMBX and HMEZX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIMBX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to HMEZX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMBX dropped -8.73% vs HMEZX's -6.86%.

HMEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMBX and HMEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer