JGYIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
JGYIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Feb 28, 2007. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGYIX John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund | 3.82% | 24.13% | 14.38% | 11.36% | -4.87% | 17.65% | -1.36% | 20.86% | -9.27% | 16.72% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGYIX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, JGYIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.94%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
JGYIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGYIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JGYIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
JGYIX
CSUAX
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGYIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 1.63 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.17 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.36 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 10.32 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGYIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.63 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.61 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between JGYIX and CSUAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
JGYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGYIX John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund | 12.96% | 13.30% | 8.21% | 4.37% | 9.51% | 11.27% | 2.71% | 4.81% | 6.31% | 2.91% | 3.19% | 7.64% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGYIX drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGYIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGYIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -52.20% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -7.98% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | -20.45% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.45% | -35.05% | -1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -4.38% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -8.49% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.83% | +0.34% |
Volatility
JGYIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that JGYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JGYIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.26% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 6.89% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 11.48% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 12.89% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 14.89% | +0.07% |